|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jacque Cruix
   |
Posted - 2011.06.05 20:31:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Akita T
Edited by: Akita T on 05/06/2011 20:15:45
So you can see now why the current state of affairs is not pleasing us... and why me and Tippia keep talking about it.
I hope you're not so big on yourself that you are saying "us" as the entire Eve player-base, but only the "few" that have decided to complain about this.
Nothing can be so annoying than a self appointed "speaker" who thinks they have the pulse of the whole.
For your op; if you think about it, CCP has consistently been removing old assets from the game to allow their development time to be more focused on what the majority uses in regard to hardware. Players complaining about this new enviroment requiring newer hardware probably won't get much traction.
I support the static load screen that is currently on Sisi, but not retainig the old hanger assets. Players clinging to that are probably simply resisting change and they need to either suck it up or go somewhere else. Eve will always be about change, since there will probably never be an Eve Online II.
|
Jacque Cruix
|
Posted - 2011.06.05 20:44:00 -
[2]
I use a HD 4800 series card and it runs CQ fine.
One needs to expect that some level of re-optimization will need to be done when dealing with WIP on a test server.
|
Jacque Cruix
|
Posted - 2011.06.05 20:52:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Soden Rah
...It is entirely possible to argue convincingly for the keeping of the current hanger view...
Yes, there are probably 20 different ways to implement this.
Most players will probably be happy with 17 of those ways.
Some would only be happy with a few.
But there are also some who would only be happy with "their" way.
|
Jacque Cruix
|
Posted - 2011.06.05 21:39:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Jacque Cruix
But there are also some who would only be happy with "their" way.
Yes. This is the group who really hate the idea of having the option not to load CQ.
I could agree with that.
|
Jacque Cruix
|
Posted - 2011.06.05 21:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Jacque Cruix
But there are also some who would only be happy with "their" way.
And let me guess... you are oh so "subtly" implying that I or any others who have objections regarding the current CQ implementation would be part of this particular group, eh ?
I guess it would depend on if one is suggesting a change or demanding a change.
Demanding too often will lead to future demands being frequently ignored.
|
|
|
| |
|